• Home
  • Insights
    • About Customer Insight
    • Ad Hoc Poll Results
    • Customer Insight
    • Green
    • Musings
    • Research Statistics
    • Top Performers
    • 495
    • RSS Feeds
  • Mobile UC
    • Mobile UC Business
    • Mobile UC Observations
    • Mobile UC Product Reviews
    • Mobile UC Service Reviews
    • Mobile UC Applications Reviews
    • Mobile UC Devices Reviews
  • Coms
    • IP Video
      • Video Conferencing Consultants
      • Telepresence Consultants
      • Video Conferencing Strategy
    • Applications
    • E911
    • Email
    • LANs & WANs
    • Messaging
    • Quality
    • Security
    • SIP
    • VoIP
    • VoIP History
  • Scores
  • Reports
    • Register?
      • Be Heard. Join our Panel.
      • Prize Winners Do Surveys
      • Unregister
    • Research Catalogs
    • Recovery Series
    • Collaboration
      • Exchange Review
    • Fundamentals
    • Messaging
    • Mobile UC
      • Alcatel-Lucent Users
      • Avaya Users
      • Cisco Users
      • Nortel Users
      • Product Manager's Guide
      • Siemens Users
    • Web 2.0
    • Pre-2007 Research
    • Comments
    • Brainshark Content Network
  • About
    • About Peter Brockmann
    • Contact Us
    • News
    • In the News...
    • Request a User Briefing
    • Request a Vendor Briefing
    • Full Disclosure Notice
    • Famous Brockmann's
  • David
Mobile UC Mobile UC Devices Reviews Smart Phone Leaders Among Top 5 Handset Makers

Smart Phone Leaders Among Top 5 Handset Makers

Sunday, 31 October 2010 15:28 Written by Peter Brockmann
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 

According to reports by IDC and Strategy Analytics, Apple was the fourth largest and RIM the fifth largest manufacturer of mobile phones in the third quarter (July-September) 2010. This is remarkable considering that Apple and RIM are the only two vendors on the list of five vendors that make only smart phones. The others, Nokia, Samsung and LG, make both feature phones and smart phones.

No doubt, organizing the list of device vendors by PROFITABILITY would position Apple and RIM even more differently. Feature phones are inexpensive to sell and inexpensive to make. They therefore carrying much less contribution margin than the more complicated and more popular smart phone class of devices. Smart phones however, attract much higher margins and marketing costs since users need to become aware of the coolest and most important features of the device long before the user arrives at the mobile phone store.

< Prev   Next >

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Send
Cancel
JComments

MidMarket companies have 40% higher (worse) Spam Index than others.

MidMarket Suffers From Poor Spam Control

Login

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?
Follow us on Twitter

Posts: All-Time Highest Rated

  • Why Register?
  • Guest Blog: Convincing Business Leaders About The Green Value of Their Low-Carbon Products
  • Internet on Us
  • 10 Most Popular Blog Entries of 2009
  • Brockmann Guest Blogs for No Jitter
  • Cisco Cius
  • Swatting Is a New Dangerous Sport
  • Cost Saving Strategies: Why Video Managed Services?
  • Identity Thieves Masquerade as Job Sites
  • Video Conferencing Consultants

Posts: Year's Most Popular

  • Why Register?
  • Mobile Apps Are Addictive
  • Now, I Have Seen It All
  • Taxes and Telecommuting
  • Breaking News - Avaya to IPO
  • Android Users Suffer Security Problems
  • Google Removes More Mal-Apps
  • Innovations in Screen Technologies
  • Applying Email Marketing Features to Personal Email
  • Where Have I Been?

Reports: All-Time Most Popular

  • Forums in Small Companies
  • Forums in Large Companies
  • The Problem With Email
  • Video Communications 2.0: Tips for Improving The Experience
  • The Manager's Recession Survival Guide video

Reports: Year's Most Popular

(c) Brockmann & Company 2002-2011 Scroll To Top